"SEAL on washing bin Laden's bloody face"It seems like the establishment is trying too hard to get us to believe. And where are these pictures this guy supposedly took? They showed us Udi, Kusi and Saddam. Those pictures were pretty gruesome. Why not bin Laden? So who gains? Obviously Obama gains. The more we talk about killing Osama bin Laden right before the election, the better for him. But maybe it's more than that. Maybe the establishment is scared about the reports that the whole thing was staged, that bin Laden died in 2001 as reported at that time, are gaining traction. The whole establishment gains if they're promoting a fraud. They had to blow up one of their own helicopters. I'm skeptical the US military that's been fighting hot wars continuously since 2001 couldn't find two functioning helicopters for the most important raid since 9/11. Besides which, the story of the raid is rather unbelievable too. Only a few people returned fire? Osama bin Laden didn't defend himself? On the other hand, it would have played better in the press if bin Laden had defended himself, which is why the press originally printed that before revising the story. Thanks to our government of lies, I don't know what to believe.
You remember how the US has intentionally caused war in Syria? It's done the same in Pakistan, but most likely unintentionally, but the US press doesn't want to report it. They don't want to report that US aggression in Afghanistan is causing conflict in nuclear armed Pakistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment