Foreign Policy

Intelligence agents report that the attack on the Libyan consulate that killed the US ambassador and three others was orchestrated by an al Qaeda agent formerly released from Guantanamo.

In the ongoing disinformation campaign being waged by the US government and its accomplice press regarding the terrorist attacks on 9/11 of this year, the latest lying headline proclaims:

"Benghazi assault a 'terrorist attack but not pre-planned'"

Apparently terrorists just happened to be walking by the consulate and decided, what the heck, let's attack and kill the US ambassador. You can't make this stuff up. Here's another report saying the same. It's like a couple of al Qaeda guys were kicking cans down the street on 9/11 and suddenly noticed an opportunity to kill the US ambassador. It's like a kid in the US might notice an opportunity to break a window, except this report is utterly stupid.

"The September 11 attack in Libya that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three colleagues wasn’t coordinated in advance, according to Matthew Olsen, director of the US National Counterterrorism Center.
US and Libyan officials differ publicly on whether the attack on the American compound in Benghazi, Libya, was planned in advance by radical Islamists or whether extremists took advantage of a peaceful protest to attack the US consulate in the country’s second-largest city."

So some bureaucrat in Washington D.C. claims to know more about what happened that one of the unarmed guards injured during the attack.

"“The best information we have now indicates that this was an opportunistic attack,” Olsen, who cautioned that the investigation isn’t finished, said at a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing today in Washington."

That's code for saying we won't tell the truth until the American people no longer care, then we'll release it and have the press hide it on page 14. I can't find words to describe how much this propagandist bull stinks to high heaven. This is why the Big Lie works. It works because honest people like me can't find the same magnitude of words to refute the tremendous magnitude of the lies.

Claim that Israelis are behind the bogus film. Since the original fraud claimed to be an Israeli Jew, this would bring the fraud full circle. My problem is everybody profits, so I can't figure out who did it. This goes back to my contention that both the Israeli government and the Palestinian government profit from conflict. Here's how the Israeli's profit:

"If someone had planned to upend US foreign policy — to utterly destroy the very basis [.pdf] of all our diplomats (and military personnel) have been working to achieve in the Middle East and throughout the Muslim world — they couldn’t have done a better job of it than whoever put together Innocence of Muslims. "

In other words, Bibbi Netanyahu profits.

Nobody ever accused Pat Buchanan of being a libertarian, but even he thinks we should bring our troops home.