"President Barack Obama authorized U.S. airstrikes in northern Iraq Thursday night, warning they would be launched if needed to defend Americans from advancing Islamic militants and protect civilians under siege. His announcement threated a renewal of U.S. military involvement in the country's long sectarian war."What Americans? And if they went to Iraq voluntarily, why should taxpayers pay for air strikes ostensibly to protect them?
"Mindful of the public's aversion to another lengthy war, Obama acknowledged that the prospect of a new round of U.S. military action would be a cause for concern among many Americans. He vowed anew not to put American combat troops back on the ground in Iraq and said there was no U.S. military solution to the crisis."Who wouldn't believe him?
""As commander in chief, I will not allow the United States to be drawn into fighting another war in Iraq," Obama said."Stop laughing.
"Even so, he outlined a rationale for airstrikes if the Islamic State militants advance on American troops in the northern city of Irbil and the U.S. consulate there. The troops were sent to Iraq earlier this year as part of the White House response to the extremist group's swift movement across the border with Syria and into Iraq."That sounds contradictory.
""When the lives of American citizens are at risk, we will take action," Obama said. "That's my responsibility as commander in chief.""So he's only protecting Americans as the commander in chief should.
"He said he had also authorized the use of targeted military strikes if necessary to help the Iraqi security forces protect civilians."Oops. Nevermind.
"The president cast the mission to assist the Yazidis as part of the American mandate to assist around the world when the U.S. has the unique capabilities to help avert a massacre."This explains why they suddenly appeared in the news a couple of days ago.
The plan to Go back to Iraq has long been underway. This picture is the evidence the US has been backing ISIS all the way.
Oops.
"By the way, how much of a "crisis" is this, really? Are the Yazidis really about to be subjected to "genocide," as our hopped-up "journalists" insist? Why would ISIS murder 40,000 in cold blood? How is that going to advance their cause? Doesn’t seem like very good public relations."Apparently the Yazidis aren't so special.
938 killed,107 wounded in Iraq.
ISIS pulls down crosses in northern Iraq, and suddenly people care.
After killing 1,000 or more Palestinians, Israeli forces suddenly recognize the difference between terrorist individuals and the Palestinian people in general.
""Moments ago, 2 rockets fired from Gaza hit southern Israel. Terrorists have violated the cease-fire," the Israel Defense Forces wrote on Twitter."Terrorist individuals, not socialist war. The Palestinians never declared socialist war against Israel. Israel declared socialist war against the Palestinians.
No comments:
Post a Comment