Police State

This version of the killing in Missouri is fantastically different than the police version.

"The first of several gunshots rang out a few seconds later. Brown and Johnson turned and fled. The officer fired a second shot at the fleeing victims, hitting Brown, who fell to the ground with his hands in the air, pleading: “I don’t have a gun — stop shooting!” The assailant fired several more shots, killing the unarmed teenager outside an apartment complex. His body was left about 35 feet from the vehicle, surrounded by empty casings from the officer’s gun. Brown was unarmed. "

Shell casings and a body in the road expose the story of the shooting occurring in the cop car as a lie.

"Police officials are peddling the claim that Brown supposedly “assaulted” his killer and attempted to grab the officer’s gun. Eyewitnesses, particularly Johnson, dispute that claim. Even if this were true, however, Johnson’s account would indicate that Brown acted in self-defense, seeking to disarm someone who had threatened to shoot him without cause. There is no dispute that Brown was unarmed, feeling, and attempting to surrender when he was fatally shot. "

Quite a different story.

"A group of violent people group hived off from the protests and attacked local businesses, including a QuickTrip convenience store. Predictably, the riot police who had assembled to “restore order” by suppressing the protests did nothing to protect private property. That role was carried out by local businessmen bearing arms in their own defense. "

Why don't cops protect private property? What are they there for?

Gun sales in St. Louis quadruple after shooting. Funny how a riot reminds people of the value of firearms.

Government steals woman's cash because she had the temerity to fly with it.

"It turns out that the septuagenarian had decided to stow her cash savings throughout her luggage and even hidden within her worn garments.
She believed it would be safer to keep it hidden.  Safe from thieves or government agents; whichever appeared first.  But her efforts to protect her cash failed.
After finding wads of cash in her wallets and carry-on bag, the agents went so far as to remove the woman’s brassiere and girdle to find the rest.  In total they seized $40,977 from the woman, which were proceeds from the recent sale of her $120,000 home."

Is this smuggling cash?

"She’ll now have to fight in court to have any hope of getting her savings returned.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Gjon Juncaj has already filed a “Complaint for Forfeiture” on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice.  The government’s intent is to permanently keep her money, just because it can.
The theft has been formalized in the Code of Federal Regulations. Americans are not allowed to freely move their money without federal government’s knowledge. Customs enforcers demand that sums of cash over $10,000 be declared with the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). FinCEN form 105 points to the places where the police state criminalizes moving money."

To the government it is.