"To put it simply, AIPAC fears that if it if lets President Obama go wobbly on Syria, it is impossible to imagine that he would undertake a war with Iran that could ignite the entire Middle East and lead to the commitment of U.S. troops in a third major Middle Eastern war in a little over a decade."The staffer concluded:
"Obviously, there is no counterpart to this on the antiwar side. No anti-AIPAC to speak of. AIPAC owns this issue. It gets what it wants. It will get this and, sad to say, my boss, who hates the idea of using more war as a means to end war, will probably vote “yes.” He says he will never support an attack on Iran but, when the time comes, this Syria push will look like nothing. Syria is just a tactic for AIPAC. But its #1 goal, at least from the vantage point of Capitol Hill, is war with Iran."That's sad.
Lindsay Graham pulls out all the stops.
"If the United States doesn't deal with Syria, Graham promised Iran would acquire a nuclear weapon by 2014, the King of Jordan would be deposed and Israel would start preparing to protect itself."Then the US shouldn't have started this proxy war.
General Petraeus is trying to rehabilitate himself by calling for war on Syria.
When all else fails, the government always uses the children as an excuse for violence, and this video of Syrian children supposedly dying from chemical weapons, which seems fake to me, is a perfect example.
Russian analysis concludes the Syrian chemical attack of March 19 was conducted by the rebels, but Russia has a dog in this fight too. But this was the suspicion of the UN inspectors too.
Some false flag attacks in history.
Corruption in Marine case.
"Defense attorneys for Capt. James V. Clement had won a judge’s order, over objections from Marine prosecutors, for two staff attorneys to testify in open court about how senior commanders had interfered in the case to get a guilty verdict."Why should the military be any different?
No comments:
Post a Comment