Sunday, November 18, 2012

Global Warming and Energy

A legal scholar examines claims about AGW and finds they fail to meet scrutiny.
"Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.”"
You don't say.

Reference to polls and other numbers.

No comments:

Post a Comment