Possible causes for the
recent report of chemical weapons use in Syria. Reasons to believe the
claims of chemical attack are bogus.
"Somehow we are supposed to believe that within 72 hours after the
arrival of a UN chemical weapons inspection team to assess — with the
Syrian government’s cooperation — the sites of previous claimed chemical
weapons attacks, that same Syrian government would launch a chemical
weapon attack on civilians just miles from where the UN inspectors are
staying. The UN inspectors were there on invitation from the Syrian
government and that same government would launch chemicals right into
their neighborhood.
"
I didn't believe it at the time.
"“None of the people treating the casualties or photographing them are
wearing any sort of chemical-warfare protective gear,” he says, “and
despite that, none of them seem to be harmed.” This would seem to rule
out most types of military-grade chemical weapons, including the vast
majority of nerve gases, since these substances would not evaporate
immediately, especially if they were used in sufficient quantities to
kill hundreds of people, but rather leave a level of contamination on
clothes and bodies which would harm anyone coming in unprotected contact
with them in the hours after an attack. In addition, he says that
“there are none of the other signs you would expect to see in the
aftermath of a chemical attack, such as intermediate levels of
casualties, severe visual problems, vomiting and loss of bowel control.”
"
More evidence against.
No comments:
Post a Comment