Thursday, January 15, 2015

Foreign Policy

Pakistani Muslims call for death penalty for Charlie Hebdo cartoonists for cover which harmed relations with Pakistan, Turkey and all Muslim countries.

Building the case the Charlie Hebdo attack was a false flag.
"Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers.
It is a plausible inference that the ID left behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. An important fact that supports this inference is the report that the third suspect in the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing his name circulating on social media as a suspect realized the danger he was in and quickly turned himself into the police for protection against being murdered by security forces as a terrorist.
Hamyd Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi."
From the linked article:
"According to iTele, Hamid Mourad said that at the time of the attack he was in lycĂ©e in Charleville-Mezieres."
If true, that will blow this story wide open.
"Authorities will have to say that despite being wrong about Mourad, they were right about the Kouachi brothers. Alternatively, Mourad could be coerced or tortured into some sort of confession that supports the official story."
Or he'll die in custody.
"Another puzzle in the official story that remains unreported by the presstitute media is the alleged suicide of a high ranking member of the French Judicial Police who had an important role in the Charlie Hebdo investigation. For unknown reasons, Helric Fredou, a police official involved in the most important investigation of a lifetime, decided to kill himself in his police office on January 7 or January 8 (both dates are reported in the foreign media) in the middle of the night while writing his report on his investigation."
That's news.

More on the free speech hypocrisy on display in Paris.

Charlie Hebdo survivors angry at the exploitation of their dead coworkers.
"Cartoonist "Luz", who drew the latest cover, seems to be uneasy with the sanctifying of Hebdo that has occurred in the past week. As he told a French website, it was "people that were assassinated, not the freedom of speech! People who sat in an office and drew cartoons." Furthermore, since Hebdo reveled in skewering symbols, finding themselves as one has been an uncomfortable experience."
So are the survivors of other attacks.
"I’m reminded of the Buzzfeed essay about the brother of a 9/11 victim visiting the new museum in New York City. In his piece, Steve Kandell explores the horror of trying to mourn his sister in the middle of a tourist attraction with a souvenir shop. This is bad enough, but he wearily notes, "The events of the day have already been exploited and sold in ways previously incomprehensible, why get mad at a commemorative T-shirt now?”"
It stinks.

After the so-called Arab spring, dictators supported by the US still rule.

I've heard a lot about the government attacking James Risen, demanding his whistleblower source for a story, but I have never heard what the whistleblower revealed. This is it.
"The story is this. The CIA drew up plans for a key part of a nuclear bomb (what a CIA officer on Wednesday described in his testimony as "the crown jewels" of a nuclear weapons program), inserted flaws in the plans, and then had a Russian give those flawed plans to Iran."
To try and frame Iran for a nuclear weapons program.
"During the trial on Wednesday morning, the prosecution's witnesses made clear both that aiding Iran in developing a part of a bomb would be illegal under U.S. export control laws, and that they were aware at the time that there was the possibility of what they were doing constituting just such aid."
Yet the whistleblower, not the people who did the deed, is on trial. Includes claim that Iran has never had a nuclear weapons program.

No comments:

Post a Comment