Police State

Appeals court overwhelmingly upholds anti-privacy doctrine as anybody should expect.

"By a 12-3 vote, appellate court judges in Richmond, Virginia, on Monday ruled that it is not — and therefore does not require a warrant.
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld what is known as the third-party doctrine: a legal theory suggesting that consumers who knowingly and willingly surrender information to third parties therefore have “no reasonable expectation of privacy” in that information — regardless of how much information there is, or how revealing it is."

This occurs because government has usurped contracts. A contract demanding that information be kept private would provide a reasonable expectation of privacy.

In what world is racist graffiti a felony?