"Instead, it would seem more logical to seriously question the Karl et al. result in light of the fact that, compared to those bulk temperatures, it is an outlier, showing a recent warming trend that is not in line with these other global records."In other words, instead of casting doubt on the pause, this paper casts more doubt on the scientific corruption that produced it. More.
"There is one glorious point they have not mentioned. Karl’s paper appears to repeal the laws of thermodynamics."The supposed heat comes from nowhere. More.
"It does look a little suspicious that NCDC arrived at this earth-shaking “discovery” after all these years, after “massaging” its own weather-station data, just before the big policy conference in December in Paris that is supposed to slow the rise of CO2 from the burning of energy fuels, coal, oil, and gas."There's the political motivation.
Other datasets don't support NOAA's claims. More.
"The authors have produced adjustments that are at odds with all other surface temperature datasets, as well as those compiled via satellite."But the others are all wrong.
Even the IPCC admits the hiatus.
"The observed global-mean surface temperature (GMST) has shown a much smaller increasing linear trend over the past 15 years than over the past 30 to 60 years… Depending on the observational data set, the GMST trend over 1998–2012 is estimated to be around one-third to one-half of the trend over 1951–2012."That's the den of frauds.
Americans' lack of concern about global warming is illustrated by poll showing 2/3s of Americans wouldn't pay $100 per year to fight global warming.
Senator proposes using RICO against skeptics.
"The Big Tobacco playbook looked something like this: (1) pay scientists to produce studies defending your product; (2) develop an intricate web of PR experts and front groups to spread doubt about the real science; (3) relentlessly attack your opponents."That describes the frauds, funded by billions from government annually, not the skeptics.
No comments:
Post a Comment