New SEC regulations
allows money market funds to refuse redemption.
"Moments ago the gates arrived, when following a close 3-2 vote (with
republican commissioner Piwowar and democrat Stein dissenting), the SEC
adopted new rules designed to curb the risk of investor runs on money
market funds, capping the end of a years-long heated debate between
regulators and the industry dating to the financial crisis according to Reuters.
Among the changes, funds will have to switch to a floating share
price instead of the current $1/share (hence the term breaking the
buck). But the key part: “The SEC’s rule will require prime money market
funds to move from a stable $1 per share net asset value, to a floating
NAV. It also will let fund boards lower redemption “gates” and fees in times of market stress.”"
It gets worse every day.
"But forget about our opinion, or even that of the SEC, because while on
the surface this now enacted proposal to establish withdrawal limits is
spun as benign, it was the Fed itself who warned in April of 2014 that “the
possibility of suspending convertibility, including the imposition of
gates or fees for redemptions, can create runs that would not otherwise
occur… Rules that provide intermediaries, such as
MMFs, the ability to restrict redemptions when liquidity falls short
may threaten financial stability by setting up the possibility of
preemptive runs.”"
Oops.
"Clearly, everyone understand that the only purpose behind
implementing “gates” is to redirect the herd. And with some $2.6
trillion in assets, money markets can serve as a convenient source of
“forced buying” now that QE is tapering
if only for the time being. The only question is whether the herd will
agree to this latest massive behavioral experiment by the Fed, and
allocate their funds to a stock market which is now trading at a higher
P/E multiple than during the last market peak.
And should this particular exercise in inflating stock bubbles fail, then gating bond funds,
another “reform” which as we reported last month is in the works,
should certainly force equities to unseen bubble proportions."
Or gold could skyrocket in an unintended consequence.
No comments:
Post a Comment